Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Demetri Dourambeis's avatar

We are all complicit in compartmentalising the unpalatable reality of modern living.

Our arts museums are founded upon the toil of slaves and people paid less than what they can feed themselves and their families on.

Our devices are constructed from minerals and rare metals mined by children. The chocolate we eat is harvested by tied labour and children, though there are ‘laws’ against it, the practice still happens.

The internet is cooled by climate-busting systems, and the content is filtered by countless of southern hemisphere people who will do what the north and western folk can’t cope with to protect us from the very worst it has to offer. Those guys have to look at it all to see what is too bad to let through.

So, what actually is the ‘evil’ of our friend Walt, aptly named after Heisenberg of uncertainty notoriety?

As the article says, there is indeed redemption of sorts in the end to suggest that even after his journey, there remains a glimmer of light in his darkened soul. Then, maybe it’s just that the end of the road has become inevitable so begging forgiveness for absolution or a cry for Mum is the last thing we all say, given the final opportunity.

Dunno, but at the risk of being a sociopath, I can sort of get his ethic of his breaking bad to the absolute best of his ability, realising his potential as a chemistry and sophistry genius from beginning to end.

He made the best meth that could be made, and the best castor seed poison to pop into a stevia sachet. Even when it came to letting his partner’s girlfriend die to keep him on side and motivated, instead of being distracted. Similarly with his silly brother-in-law in the desert. The most challenging and initial breaking point may have been the young kid on the bicycle who stumbled on them transferring chemicals from one train tanker to another. Tough decisions, but correct.

Anyway, they were only actors and didn’t really die!

Not like all those innocent women and children in real life that Obama had wasted as collateral damage at targeted family gatherings in order to take out a few bad guys. He will have weighed the potential good and the bad behind those decisions and come to a conclusion he thought was best at the time. The morality of conducting lethal warfare thousands of miles away in a PlayStation format is debatable, especially when it’s conducted under the banner of the Stars and Stripes with the authority of the leader of the ‘free’ world.

Y’see, it’s complicated! There is no clear cut evil, nor good. The Nietzsche quote is correctly used.

Walt wasn’t evil, he was just like the rest of us, but better at it!

- -

Great post by the way. Top writing.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts